Questions in the House. - Mr Churchill First Lord of the Admiralty
Sinking of Submarine A3.
HC Deb 20 February 1912 vol 34 cc449-52 449
§Mr. FALLE asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if he can give any particulars of the sinking of the submarine A3; if he can state if it is proposed to purchase or to construct a salvage vessel or vessels 450 and station the same at Portsmouth and other dockyards; and, if so, if he can name a date when such will be provided; if it is beyond the constructive skill of the dockyards of this country to devise means of escape for the crew of a damaged submarine; and if any provision has been or is to be made for the pecuniary relief of the families of the crew of the submarine A3?
Sir C. KINLOCH COOKE asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether he has any information to give the House with regard to the sinking of submarine A 3; whether he is satisfied that the Admiralty possess the most effective and up-to-date salvage plant; and whether the salvage plant for submarines in the German Navy could have dealt with the accident that happened to submarine A 3 in a more effective manner than has been possible with the plant in the possession of the Admiralty?
§Mr. CHURCHILL If I may, I will answer Questions 59 and 62 together. The A 3 was sunk on 2nd February as the result of a collision with His Majesty's ship "Hazard." The submarine was running submerged at the time, was struck by the propellers of the "Hazard," and immediately foundered in eleven fathoms of water. The salvage equipment in the possession of the Admiralty comprises a combined mooring and salvage lighter, No. 94, capable of lifting a dead load of 270 tons, built at Chatham Dockyard in 1910–11, and delivered to Sheerness on completion; a new salvage lighter, No. 96, capable of lifting a dead load of about 450 tons is under construction by Messrs. Vickers, and is expected to be completed by about the middle of May, 1912. In addition to these, there are two lighters at each of the following dockyards, Portsmouth, Devonport, and Sheerness, which are capable of lifting a submarine not full of water. The equipment is considered suitable for the present requirements of the Navy. It is the practice in the British submarine service to carry out diving operations under all conditions and in all depths of water; and it is not possible to introduce any device which can be guaranteed to afford certain means of escape in every contingency. All possible ways of reducing risks and of saving life after accidents to submarines will be constantly studied by the Admiralty, in frequent consultation with the principal officers in the submarine service, whose opinion must be taken as an important guide. With regard to the provision made 451 for the pecuniary relief of the families of the deceased sailors, I am informed that pensions to widows and allowances to orphans have already been awarded, according to scale, in certain of the cases from Greenwich Hospital funds. In the remaining cases inquiry is being made. I cannot refer to this subject without expressing on behalf of the House of Commons the sorrow which is felt by all at the loss of these brave and skilful officers and sailors who were overtaken by a mercifully sudden death in the discharge of the dangerous duties they so cheerfully fulfil.
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1912/feb/20/sinking-of-submarine-a3SUBMARINE A3.
HC Deb 28 February 1912 vol 34 cc1342-3 1343
§Lord CHARLES BERESFORD asked whether the contract for the salvage of Submarine A3 has been given to a foreign company; whether the First Lord of the Admiralty will state the name of the company; whether the British National Salvage Association had a vessel or vessels all ready to undertake the contract; whether that association tendered to render assistance on the 3rd February, 1912; and, if so, whether he will state to the House why the tender of the British National Salvage Association was not accepted?
§Mr. CHURCHILL The company in question is understood to be a British company; it is known as the Sea Salvage Company. Several companies offered assistance, of which the company named in the question was one. It is contrary to Admiralty custom to give reasons for non-acceptance of tenders. The company selected was chosen by officers on the spot as being capable of rendering immediate service.
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1912/feb/28/submarine-a3